Posted 26 June 2012, 09:25 | by Ben Duguid | Perma-link
Just to keep things ticking over while job hunting, I'm working on a site for a friend of a friend:
Pete Crispin's a London based Marine Surveyor, who consults on both commercial and private vessels, and operates worldwide.
We're working on the Information Architecture at the moment, and will be putting together a small CMS for him in the coming weeks.
Filed under: Websites
Posted 16 November 2011, 15:43 | by Ben Duguid | Perma-link
It's finally here: After 12 months of other people defining, and committing to support it, one of the latest StackExchange sites to enter public beta is LEGO Answers - Bricks.StackExchange.com*, the place to ask all your LEGO and compatible brick building questions.
This is the first time I've been really actively involved in the private beta of one of these sites - I was in the WebMasters one enough to fulfil my obligations and earn the Beta badge, but not as much as this time, so here are my thoughts on the process.
Working with a group of others remotely, on a site that doesn't encourage "chatter" is hard - Chat is there, but it's not that heavily used at the moment - when what you really want to do is sit down with a few drinks and discuss some of the issues: I had to remind myself on a few occasions not to take things personally, especially as there is a large group of users for whom English isn't a first language - they're doing a lot better than I would do if the site were in German or French 
, I just hope I didn't cause any offence either...
One of the features of StackExchange sites is that as users gain reputation, they gain access to tools and features on the site that give them more say in the running of the site - as is pointed out on the FAQs:
At the high end of this reputation spectrum there is little difference between users with high reputation and ♦ moderators. That is very much intentional. We don’t run LEGO® - Stack Exchange. The community does.
But also, during the beta phase, the reputation requirements are lowered so that the actual users rather than CHAOS moderators do most of the day to day running of the site.
During Private Beta, the reputation requirements are very low, around 1000 rep gets you access to moderation tools - by the end of private beta, we had three or four users who were just over this threshold and helping out Dori and Robert (the two mod's I've really seen around, no disrespect to Geoff, Emmett or Rebecca). Suddenly the site goes into Public Beta, and the threshold's instantly raised to 2000 rep, and a load of new users join the site (that's a good thing 
) but suddenly, it's left to Dori and Robert to manage the influx (it probably wasn't that big) of flags, suggested edits, etc., and my edits suddenly need approval again - I mean, I've proved myself already haven't I?
I guess part of this would have been resolved if the influx of users had actually been asking questions that people could answer and vote on - then the reputation would have risen fast enough to counter this - as it is, after nearly two weeks in public beta, I've nearly regained access to the moderation tools .
We need your help - come and ask questions - come and give better answers - and don't be put off by thinking your question is silly, or someone's edited your answer - we're here to help, and craft the best resource for LEGO Q&A's there is - we really need to increase our daily question rate for example.
As some examples, I've had some great answers to building graveyard rooms for Heroica games and building a roof with a 60º pitch, others have been trying to work out how to invert the direction of bricks so that the studs are touching.
* The name may well change - The LEGO Group understandably don't want "LEGO" in the title. Vote for your choice over on the meta question: Site may not be described as LEGO Answers - call for alternative titles
Filed under: Websites
Posted 01 March 2010, 22:02 | by Ben Duguid | Perma-link
A couple of updates on stuff:
). This was built using the amazing N2 CMS, which gave me everything I was looking for in a content management system, running in ASP.NET MVC, without me having to build the bulk of it - I'll do some posts in the future on the tweaks I made to it.I've also realised that I only mentioned half of the solution to a problem in my last post on moving from Linq to SQL to Entity Framework - namely how I solved the lazy loading of properties - it's there in the picture, but I haven't spelt it out, so there's another post coming on that.
Filed under: Websites
Posted 10 May 2007, 10:40 | by Ben Duguid | Perma-link
Hmm, that's quite impressive. We only launched doodleTunes, Music for the Under 5's last week, and we're already the top result in Google for "Music for the under 5's" and "Music for the under 5's Beckenham". Who say's we don't know what we're doing here? 
All I need to do now I guess is work on "Music for the under fives" and I'll be there.
Filed under: Websites
Posted 30 April 2007, 02:25 | by Ben Duguid | Perma-link
In what is probably a new record for me, I've managed to get an entire site up and running over the weekend.
My wife and a friend are setting up a business together putting on music classes for babies and toddlers along with their parents.
Having come up with a name on Thursday evening, we managed to come up with a logo, and content for the site over the last weekend - along with a Sunday Lunch for my sister, and drinks and a curry with some mates on Saturday.
So, without further ado, may I present:
doodleTunes: Music for the Under 5's
As ever, let us know if you spot any major issues.
[Update 2011/05/13: Sadly nothing ever came of the venture, and the site has been taken down to limit confusion]
Filed under: Websites
Posted 16 March 2001, 09:11 | by Ben Duguid | Perma-link
Launched the main site too, got bored of fiddling with it - rest to follow soon…
Filed under: Websites